How Does Workplace Racial Affinity Help Build a Stronger Culture?

According to experts, establishing workplace racial affinity groups can help address social injustices and promote accountability among the staff. It can help strengthen workplace culture and enhance the individuality of different ethnic groups within an organization. Minority groups, such as Hispanics, certain religions, and people of color can be underrepresented in an organization. Racial affinity can help deal with employees’ rising bias and judgment from certain ethnic groups and religions that negatively affect the business culture. Respecting everyone and treating people equally regardless of race, religion, color, or gender is something we can all get behind to relieve racism and discrimination in the workplace.


What is Racial Affinity?


Racial equity in workplaces has reportedly become a problem to some organizations when self-identified “marginalized” employees say they feel the effects daily. Thus, many progressive’s educators and those in the media try to speak for these groups claiming racial affinity is among the many approaches developed to create an inclusive and equitable work culture. These so-called experts claim racial affinity or racial caucuses provide people with a safe space to share personal experiences and identify how racism manifests in the workspace. The employers can then take up recommendations placed by the racial affinity groups to address inequalities and adopt corrective measures.


Workplace Racial Affinity


What approaches to Employ?


Most experts advocate for the separation of the workforce based on the ethnicity of racial lines when implementing the racial affinity approach. This seems to do the opposite of what they are trying to accomplish, bringing unity by separation; however, facilitators are encouraged to separate white groups from people of color or any other ethnic group to be effective. For instance, it assumed that putting the different races in one group would cause people of color to slow down for the white people to catch up. In the creation of the various groups, the designers should set up the aim of caucusing. You should know that each group might arrive at different answers.


Aim of Caucusing


Racial affinity aims to abolish unity, individuality, and creativity altogether, which some may see as a positive outcome. It assumes there are existing racial inequalities in the workforce in every situation trying to establish a way forward to address and prevent undefined and vague shortcomings in the future. In addition, the ideology claims it is a place for learning for a multiracial workforce. It allows for the development of strategies and actions that limit racial injustices and biases at workplaces. Racial groups aim to identify how a multiracial team can work together and separate while maintaining a solid culture. Although it might seem the conversation relies majorly on the people of color, white employees should be involved in the talks through the white caucuses to get their insight and understanding.


While in and of themselves caucus seems to dismantle unity, the groups are encouraged to have the backing of the managers and leaders of the organization for the success of racial affinity. Leaders can join community-based caucuses to get insight from a group that lacks power dynamics. The information leaders derived from these groups are encouraged to improve the condition and impart accountability at work. After the caucuses have shared their view separately, the facilitators should organize sessions where the two meet and collaborate to create accountability.


Again, according to these so-called experts, for white staff, the racial affinity groups are a place for dismantling white supremacy to develop a good relationship with people of color. Contrarily, the latter can use the space to offer mutual support and identify strategies to eliminate racial harm. Their conclusion? Dismantling systemic racism, especially inside workspaces, requires disrupting policies, practices, and behaviors that preserve the existing inequalities. Or in other words, we need to separate everyone into groups based on skin color and religion to bring everyone together. Does this make any sense?